Box 186
Contains 109 Results:
Mrs. Leila M. Pirkle vs. Cassity, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Sherri Smith, etc. vs. McKesson and Robbins, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Emory M. Spencer vs. Stanolind Oil and Gas Co., 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Stephenson vs. Triangle Publications, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Stewart and Stevenson Services vs. Motor Vessel “Ronald William”, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Tackett vs. Globe Indemnity Company, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Taxin vs. Tankersley, etc, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Terry vs. Zachry Co., 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Texas Electric Company, In the Matter Of, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Tex. Frozen Foods Corp., 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
C. J. Thompson et al, In the Matter of, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S.A. vs. Jesus Mendoza Alvarez, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S.A. vs. Geo. Douglas Askey, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S.A. vs. Bennett-Ray Canning Co. Inc. et al, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S.A. vs. A.A. Corry and Maurita Corry, 1952
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.