Box 188
Contains 125 Results:
U.S.A. vs. Pracides Pablo Pelegrin Y. Hernandez et al, 1955
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S.A. vs. Hardin D. Pruitt, 1955
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S.A. vs. Jose Daniel Guerrero Ruiz, 1955
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S.A. vs. Milton Van Scoy, alias Daniel Esswyn, 1955
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S.A. vs. Chester Thomas Vandable, 1955
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S.A. vs. Mike Vitemb, 1955
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S. Court of Appeals – Mrs. Guy M. Wetherbee, a Widow, etc. vs. Safety Casualty Company, 1955
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Wichita Falls Division – Memorandums, 1955
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Wichita Falls, 1955
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Zapata Co. (85,237 ac.) State and Munoz-Laredo, U.S.A. vs., 1955
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
U.S.A. vs. Alamo Fence Co. et al, 1956
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Andrade vs. Sahli, Dist. Director Immigration, etc., 1956
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Benavides vs. Holly Sugar Corp.; Camacho vs. Holly Sugar Corp., 1956
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Bradshaw, Jr. vs. Trawlers Carol Ann and El Rancho, 1956
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.
Branson vs. Sears Roebuck and Co., 1956
As with the correspondence, this sub-series is divided into two time periods corresponding to Allred’s two judgeships. The first period, 1939 to 1942, is arranged alphabetically by plaintiff’s name or by function, with folders arranged chronologically by year. The second period, 1949 to 1959 is arranged chronologically by year and alphabetically within years by plaintiff’s name.